Posts tagged ‘zionist agenda’

History mythbusters: Zionists design myth of Jewish genome to usurp Palestine ………..

Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:37PM GMT
By Jim W. Dean

They perpetrated the fraud solely to support the bogus biblical claim to Palestine which was anchored in their being a separate people. This distinguished them from all others because they claimed a land title in their blood. They bet the farm on this DNA proof of purchase, a God given bar coded passport to the Palestine. Dr. Ehaik just erased the bar code. It was just stamped on anyway, because it was never in the blood.

On December 14, 2012, Dr. Eran Elhaik turned almost two generations of Jewish genome research upside down. But he went even further. The young Israeli-Ameican geneticist has charged former researchers with academic fraud, and he has the research to back it up.
How could those those eminent Jewish scientist before him have been so wrong? Easy says Dr. Elhaik, “First these researchers decided what conclusions they wanted to find, and then they set off to find evidence to support it.” I was not bashing Jewish scientists. What Elhaik has described is a slam dunk fraud.

But why? Why would Jews who take such pride in the academic achievement risk exposing themselves to a group deception which was bound to be discovered later? Dr. Elhaik does not delve into the quicksand of the politics, but I will gladly do so.

They perpetrated the fraud solely to support the bogus biblical claim to Palestine which was anchored in their being a separate people. This distinguished them from all others because they claimed a land title in their blood. They bet the farm on this DNA proof of purchase, a God given bar coded passport to the Palestine. Dr. Ehaik just erased the bar code. It was just stamped on anyway, because it was never in the blood.

Why, why did they do it? The second half of the answer not revealed in his research was that you had a bunch of atheist, communist Jews shoot their way into taking over the Land with the sole moral cover that ‘God gave it us only’.

Before I had a bookcase of Judacia in my library I must say I was a bit suspicious of these atheist Jews whipping out God’s dual land title and passport. It was propaganda of course. It always was. And the story for another day is why did an entire academic community who should have known better, cower down and debase themselves in their own community by allowing the fraud to not only be birthed, but continued?

Arthur Koestler’s The Thirteen Tribe was a major influence in cracking the fraud. It was published in the day when Zionist propagandist were very savvy in not attacking an esteemed Jewish author. They had no fear from the academic community, already neutralized, and Kostler’s book did not generate a moral tipping point challenge to the Zionist false claim on the Land.

Dr. Elhaik literally nails the fraudsters to the cross, “….[they] assumed that the Jews constitute a group that is genetically isolated from other nations.”…That’s because Jews were never genetically isolated, making all those other studies fatally flawed and very often contradictory.

I was wondering what weapon of mass destruction that the Jewish Lobby bullies would unleash upon the young Israeli-American geneticist. I expected to be reading about Alan Dershowitz denouncing him as a self hating Jew, when actually that is what Dershowitz is. He and Abe Foxman compete for the most negative Jewish stereotype/best bully competition award annually.

But there has been no attack. The 32 year old Dr.Elhaid is getting the Arthur Koestler treatment, in spades. What do I mean? Well, his research paper was published by the Oxford University Press, in the prestigious journal Genome Biology and Evolution. But do you think a bunch of savvy Zionist propagandists are going to worry about the mass public ever hearing a thing about his research? Of course not. And are these same pretend-a-Jews going to risk giving his work a 100 times more exposure by attacking him publicly?

Let’s get back to Dr. Elhaik hammering the nails in, “First these researchers decided what conclusion they wanted to find, and then they set off to find evidence to support it…It is my impression that their results were written before they began the research. First they shot the arrow – and then the painted a bull’s-eye around it.”

Take a moment to ponder what he said there, folks. Does that sound like someone trembling in fear of Jewish Lobby power in America, or someone thinking that his career is over and committing hari-kari? No. That ‘painted a bull’s-eye around it’ was not an off the cuff remark, but one he had chosen to use in a Haaretz interview. This is a young man who is NOT standing on the shoulders of the fraudsters who have gone before him. On the contrary he wants to stand on their academic bones by exposing them, and he has.

More from his Haaretz interview, “The various groups of Jews in the world today do not share a common genetic origin. We are talking here about groups that are very heterogeneous and which are connected solely by religion…[the] genome of European Jews is a mosaic of ancient peoples and its origin is largely Khazar.”

Now onto some of the science highlights. Dr. Elhaik’s research shows that the dominant element in the genetic makeup of European Jews is Khazar. For Central European Jews it is 38%, while for East Europeans it is 30%. To that you can add his findings that in both groups their genome is mostly Western European. Surprise, surprise.

The Roman empire is the dominant lineage there, those that settled on the frontier, like retired soldiers, and the locals with whom they produced families. There were some Jewish merchants there as Elhaik did find some Middle Eastern roots which he suspects are Mesopotamian and a bit of biblical Israel.

But here comes the slam dunk…the Israel connection is such a tiny part of their overall genome that it cancels out their DNA title claim to the Land. The good doctor would not wander into this swamp but I will, by calling a spade a spade. What Dr. Elhaik has discovered folks is a ‘reverse holocaust’, the inventing of huge numbers of pseudo-Jews who have no more a blood claim to the land of Palestine than I do, even if I converted.

What I have just stated in no way challenges a religious or cultural affiliation. But as we all know, most Jews are not religious, including in Israel where way more than most are not. Subtracting that, then all you have is the tribe, the DNA, which unites them to a shared history of persecution. But that folks, is now all gone. Poof…gone.

Who among use does not have some genetic make up of a people who had suffered in ancient times, even numbers of different peoples, five or ten different ones? Why should we allow the pretend-a-Jews to send all of our gene pool to the back of the historical suffering bus as Club Med ancestors who enjoyed the ‘all inclusive’ treatment. I find that just a bit too convenient.

So these ‘Jews’, are they then just a gang, united to be against all those not in the gang? Have they invented the whole story in a way like gang members take an oath and defend territory? And is that not where Herzl and others before him saw an opening, that the Land could be a territory bond to unite Jews who were always fighting like cats and dogs amongst each other?

And is not the 2000 years of persecution claimed mostly by those who are not really descended from those actual people? Who really has holocausted whom here, and why? We had Golda Meir’s instant holocausting of the Palestinian people with her infamous, “There are no Palestinian people.”

Is this not poetic justice from Dr. Elhiak, that he brings us scientific proof of there being no biblical Jewish people as such as they have presented themselves? And does this not also make a fraud of the historical ‘anti-semite’ smear, by a people who aren’t even semites?

I think it might be time to start setting things straight on the Founding Myths. I must admit that I never expected to get a free ticket to the truth from a smart young Iaraeli doctor from John Hopkins who has his moral rudder deep in the water. He is not a gangster, whoever his ancestors were. We call this…leadership, with maybe a touch of Moses parting the Founding Myth waters for those who want to walk through to the other side.

We shall now see if others choose to be free, or to run with the gang. The militant Israelis, they always knew this day was coming. That is what their nukes have been for, always. They knew. They never believed it themselves.


Jim W. Dean comes from an old military family dating back to the American Revolution. His father was a WWII P-40 and later P-51 Mustang fighter pilot. Jim’s mother was a WWII widow at 16, her first husband killed with all 580 aboard when the SS Paul Hamilton, an ammunition ship with 7000 tons of explosives aboard, was torpedoed off the coast of Algiers. He has appeared on PBS most recently on the Looking for Lincoln documentary with Prof. Henry Lewis Gates and lectured at the Army Command and General Staff School at Fort Gordon. His current writing focus is on national security, intelligence, black and psyops, military/Intel history including personal video archives, and the current wars. Jim Dean is the managing editor of Veterans Today. More articles by Jim W. Dean
 52 20

Ben Zygier, RIP ………….

Israel’s international fifth column exposed

by , February 15, 2013

The shocking story of Ben Zygier, a 34-year-old Australian recruited by the Mossad and quite possibly murdered in an Israeli jail cell in 2010, has exposed Israel’s international fifth column to the light of day. This whale surfaces every once in a while. Remember the “passport farm” run by the Israelis in New Zealand back in 2004? Similar operations were uncovered in Australia and in Israel itself: regarding the latter, travelers to the Jewish state had their identities stolen, their passports duplicated and handed out like candy to Mossad agents. Then there were those two FBI raids on the Washington headquarters of AIPAC, the powerful Israeli lobby, during the course of which agents surrounded the building and carted out boxes of documents and computer hard drives as part of the Steve Rosen-Keith Weissman affair, in which two top AIPAC officials were indicted and tried for stealing US secrets from the Pentagon, and only had their case dropped because a trial would have revealed those secrets to the world. And who could forget that 2001 Fox News four-part series reported by Carl Cameron, which concluded there was evidence the Israelis were watching the 9/11 hijackers on American soil and failed to report their movements to US authorities?

This time, however, the story has an unusual twist. It appears that Zygier, a fervent Zionist, discovered something that caused him to turn against his Mossad bosses – something so sensitive, of such importance to the Jewish state, that his incarceration in a Israel’s high security Ayalon prison – in a “suicide-proof” cell originally designed for Yitzhad Rabin’s assassin – was a closely-guarded secret. Prison personnel were not told his identity, and a media blackout was imposed shortly after the story of “Prisoner X” came out in the Israeli media. All mentions of the arrest were scrubbed from Israeli web sites.

That was two years ago. Now we learn Zygier “committed suicide” in his suicide-proof cell.

The Australians had been on his trail for a while. He and two other Australians who had emigrated to Israel and then returned after changing their names – and applying for Australian passports – were under investigation for engaging in espionage. An Australian journalist had questioned Zygier about his activities, and he furiously denied being involved in any covert activities on Israel’s behalf. There are reports of his interrogation by ASIO, Australia’s intelligence agency.

There seems little doubt Zygier was recruited by Mossad ten to twelve years ago: his friends are now recalling it. The New York Times says he used at least four names: Ben Zygier, Ben Alon, Ben Allen and Benjamin Burrows, traveling to Iran, Syria, and Lebanon on behalf of his Israeli paymasters. The nature of his transgression has yet to be definitively revealed, yet the story is coming out in spite of the Israeli government’s frantic efforts to stop it. The Sydney Morning Herald reports:

“Australian security officials suspect that Ben Zygier, the spy who died in a secret Israeli prison cell in 2010, may have been about to disclose information about Israeli intelligence operations, including the use of fraudulent Australian passports, either to the Australian government or to the media before he was arrested.

“‘[Zygier] may well have been about to blow the whistle, but he never got the chance,’ an Australian security official with knowledge of the case told Fairfax Media yesterday.

“Sources in Canberra are insistent that the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) was not informed by its Israeli counterparts of the precise nature of the espionage allegations against Mr Zygier. However, it is understood that the former Melbourne law graduate had been in contact with Australian intelligence.”

There is much speculation surrounding the reasons for Zygier’s arrest: the most popular appears to be that he was about to reveal details of the 2010 Mossad hit job in Dubai, during which an entire team of some 20 Mossad agents succeeded in murdering an Arab arms dealer with links to Hamas.

The problem with this theory is that the facts about that case are pretty much known: the Israelis collected data from travelers to Israel and then used it to create bogus passports, which were then issued to Mossad agents. Photos of these agents appeared in the Kuwaiti media, and were published on the internet. A Kuwaiti paper is now claiming it was Zygier who turned over this information, including the photos, to the Kuwaitis, and that the Israelis kidnapped him in Kuwait. The paper quotes “a former Mossad commander” who contends Zygier was part of the Dubai assassination team until he “switched to the other side.” Yet this tall tale hardly explains why the Israelis would keep the identity of “Prisoner X” such a closely-guarded secret, quashing press reports of his incarceration, and denying his very existence until now. It wouldn’t explain why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called an “emergency” meeting with Israeli editors over their handling of the story. And it wouldn’t account for the fact that Zygier was apparently in contact with the Australian intelligence service prior to his arrest – or have they, too, “switched to the other side”?

I guess it all depends on what one means by “other side.” Because, from the perspective of the increasingly isolated Israeli government – which cultivates a narrative of the Jewish state as besieged on every side – “the other side” means everybody else, including the West.

We don’t know the nature of Zygier’s “crime,” but we know with reasonable certainty what it was not. In all likelihood it had nothing to do with the Dubai assassination, the forging of passports, or any of the other depredations against international law and morality that we already know about. It’s something new – and worse.

There is some speculation it had something to do with the impersonation of CIA officers by Mossad agents who were trying to recruit Jundullah terrorists in their campaign to destabilize Iran, and this may be more credible: after all, according to the report by Mark Perry in Foreign Policy, “The Israelis, flush with American dollars and toting U.S. passports, posed as CIA officers in recruiting Jundallah operatives – what is commonly referred to as a ‘false flag’ operation.” (Emphasis added.)

So it isn’t just Australian, New Zealand, and European passports the Israelis are stealing – there’s an Israeli “passport farm” churning out American passports, too. But then again, why would Zygier – reportedly a committed Zionist, who had been recruited by Mossad and emigrated to Israel where he started a family – threaten to expose this type of operation? It doesn’t add up – unless the Israelis were mounting an operation against his native Australia, or other Western countries such as the US.

Israel’s Mossad is notorious for its ruthlessness, and its unwillingness to play by the rules: for example, when it comes to industrial espionage, Israel’s Western “allies” are considered fair game. A GAO report on Israeli espionage in the US concluded the Jewish state “conducts the most aggressive espionage operation against the United States of any U.S. ally.” Australia presumably merits the same treatment. But Zygier didn’t “switch sides” because of a few stolen gadgets. It had to have been something that aroused his conscience, and perhaps reawakened long dormant loyalty to his Australian homeland – or to the concept of morality itself.

This is not the Israel we once knew, or thought we knew. We are dealing here with Bibi Netanyahu’s Israel, a country veering to the very edge of fundamentalist extremism, increasingly aggressive and impatient to assert itself as the dominant power in the Middle East. Their above-ground lobby is not only hyperactive, it is hyper-potent, strong enough to rule the US Congress with an iron hand – as Chuck Hagel pointed out, to his sorrow – and do much to push the US into a disastrous war in Iraq (as John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt showed in their book on The Israel Lobby). Yet what about the clandestine aspect of this phenomenon – the covert complement to Israel’s overt fifth column? The Zygier affair gives us a brief, incomplete glimpse at this sinister subterranean creature, and a scary one it is.

No, we don’t know why the Israelis kept “Prisoner X” locked up in absolute secrecy, and then panicked when word leaked out about his “suicide.” No, we don’t know for sure that he was murdered by his jailers – although his lawyer, who saw him days before his death, has said he seemed rational and not at all suicidal. We can’t know for certain what horror he uncovered, and caused him to rebel. Yet that horror, whatever it was, was no ordinary one: it motivated him to reject the views and actions of a lifetime, and reverse course with stunning abruptness.

Zygier was reportedly offered a plea bargain by the Israeli authorities, and turned it down because he was determined to clear his name. Was he an Israeli Bradley Manning, intent on exposing the crimes of the Jewish state – crimes we can only imagine?


The Republican filibuster of Chuck Hagel reared its head too late for me to comment, and I’ll save my remarks for Monday, when the dust has cleared. Suffice to say here that I was far too optimistic to shout “How Sweet It Is!” — the title of my last column on the Hagel nomination. That’ll teach me to jump the gun when it comes to declaring victory over the Lazarus-like neocons. I have to take some grim satisfaction, however, in pointing out that the Senate vote underscores my political acuity when it comes to another topic I’ve been dealing with this week – the politics of Sen. Rand Paul, a.k.a. Paul the Lesser.

Sen. Paul voted “no,” giving the Hagel-haters the one-vote margin they needed to delay the confirmation for another ten days. Phil Klein, neoconnish political reporter over at the Washington Examiner, tweeted “Rand Paul, neocon hero!” To which I can only say – with absolutely no relish – didn’t I tell you so? Heck, I nailed the Lesser Paul back in 2010, before he even made it to the Senate.

Yes, but my prescience – however much I brag and carry on about it – is really no fun at all: remember Cassandra, of Greek mythology, who offended the gods and was punished in a unique manner? The poor thing was granted the gift of prophecy, but cursed with the proviso that no one would ever believe her. These days I often recall the poet Robinson Jeffers’s conjuration of this ancient tale:

“The mad girl with the staring eyes and long white fingers
Hooked in the stones of the wall,
The storm-wrack hair and screeching mouth: does it matter, Cassandra,
Whether the people believe
Your bitter fountain? Truly men hate the truth, they’d liefer
Meet a tiger on the road.
Therefore the poets honey their truth with lying; but religion –
Vendors and political men
Pour from the barrel, new lies on the old, and are praised for kind
Wisdom. Poor bitch be wise.
No: you’ll still mumble in a corner a crust of truth, to men
And gods disgusting – you and I, Cassandra.”

A final note: In case you haven’t seen the front page, our fundraising drive is still in full swing – but we haven’t allowed it to take over practically the entire page, as per usual – we’re waiting to see if subtlety works. If it doesn’t we’ll go back to hitting our readers and supporters over the head with the works. I just hope it doesn’t come to that and for a very good reason: there’s too much going on. These are unusually active times in the world of foreign policy, and the question of war and peace is at the top of the national agenda. The debate has never been fiercer. And it has never been more important for us to carry out our primary mission: to keep our readers fully educated and up-to-date on matters dealing with America’s relationship with the rest of the world.

In short: please don’t make us devote 2/3rds of the front page to a freaking fundraising appeal. Please make your fully tax-deductible donation today – nay, right now. Before I go crazy.

I’m on Twitter quite a bit these days: you can follow me here.

Here is the link for buying the second edition of my 1993 book, Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement, with an Introduction by Prof. George W. Carey, a Forward by Patrick J. Buchanan, and critical essays by Scott Richert and David Gordon (ISI Books, 2008).

Buy my biography of the great libertarian thinker, An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard (Prometheus Books,2000), here.


Socializing losses: Trilateral takeover of Europe? …………


Published: 13 November, 2011, 19:07
Edited: 14 November, 2011, 02:17

Anti-austerity protesters hold a Greek flag reading 'not for sale' during a student parade in Athens, attended by the Greek minister of education (AFP Photo / LOUISA GOULIAMAKI)

Anti-austerity protesters hold a Greek flag reading ‘not for sale’ during a student parade in Athens, attended by the Greek minister of education (AFP Photo / LOUISA GOULIAMAKI)

The sovereign debt crisis tightening its grip on Europe has claimed the scalps of two prime ministers – those of Greece and Italy. Looking at the men poised to replace them, one cannot but ask – is this another turn of the screw for ordinary people?

Greece and Italy hold huge swathes of public debt they are unable to service unless they get massive European Central Bank and International Monetary Fund support, as a prelude to refinancing by international banks.

Greece has replaced its prime minister after he dared to say he would put a further round of harsh austerity measures to a referendum vote. The country’s new PM is Lucas Papademos, former vice president of the ECB and of Greece’s own Central Bank, and a member of David Rockefeller’s (JPMorgan Chase/Exxon) powerful Trilateral Commission.

As for Italy, instead of Silvio Berlusconi they got the former European Commissioner Mario Monti, who happens to be European chairman of the Trilateral Commission.

Whenever we hear of “sovereign debt crises” – whether in Mexico 1997, Brazil 1999, in my native Argentina in 2001/2, or today in Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland and (soon to come) the UK, France, or the US – what it really means is that governments cannot collect enough tax revenues from their people to pay interest and capital on debt that is mostly in the hands of private banking institutions.

Cutting through the Orwellian Newspeak* of the media, this means that the people of Greece, Italy, and Argentina must pay for the mistakes of bankers and corrupt governments, suffering higher taxes, unemployment, lower wages and pensions, and a deterioration in public healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

So, whenever there is a public debt crisis, “We the People” must pay for it.

­Adrian Salbuchi is a political analyst, author, speaker and radio/TV commentator in Argentina

However, when in September 2008a private debt crisis exploded due to the derivatives swindle which buried Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, AIG and many other private institutions, the US and other governments came to the rescue of the bankers, providing bailouts for banks “too big to fail” (Newspeak for too powerful to fail). They saved the likes of CitiCorp, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs with…. taxpayers money (TARP), and by having the FED (hyper)inflate the US dollar (know in Newspeak as “Quantitative Easing I, II and III”), which means passing a huge chunk of the cost of those bailouts on to the Rest of the World using the US dollar as global currency.

So again, irrespective of whether debt collapses are public or private, it is always “We the People” who pay because, under the current system, all profits are privatized and all losses are socialized.

But let us go back to Messrs Monti and Papademos. They sit on the Trilateral Commission together with hundreds of corporate chairmen and CEOs such as Ana Botin (Bank Banesto/Santander, Spain), Peter Sutherland (Goldman Sachs/BP, UK), Michel David-Weill (Lazard Bank, France), Jurgen Fitschen (Deutsche Bank, Germany), Stephen Green (HSBC, UK), Nigel Higgins (Rothschild Group, UK), Lord Guthrie (N M Rothschild, UK), Klaus-Peter Müller (Commerzbank, Germany), Dieter Rampl (UniCredito, Italy), Otto Ruding (CitiCorp Europe), Lord Simon of Highbury (Morgan Stanley, UK), Emilio Ybarra (BBVA, Spain), Robert Kelly (Bank of NY Mellon) Lord Brittan (UBS, UK), Robert Zoellick (World Bank), plus Timothy Geithner, Henry Kissinger and many, many others…

In fact, the Trilateral Commission articulates with the powerful Council on Foreign Relations (New York), Chatham House (London) and many other think-tanks forming an intricate web of private global power-brokers bringing together key players in finance, industry, media, government, academia, intelligence and the military, who run today’s global system focusing on their interests, and clearly not on those of “We the People.”

No doubt Messrs Papademos and Monti will do everything necessary to ensure Italy and Greece do not default on their debts – but rather that their peoples endure all the hardship, undergo all the pain, and make all the sacrifices so that major bankers sitting on the Trilateral can all get their money back. Those who should never have made loans to Greece and Italy (and Argentina and Portugal…) the way they did.

Adrian Salbuchi for RT

* Newspeak – a fictional language in George Orwell’s novel “1984”.


Oslo terror attacks: Zionism rears its ugly head again ……….

Niall Bradley
Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:34 CDT
Norway is understandably in deep shock following the horrific shooting spree and bomb attack in Oslo last Friday 22 July. The worst terrorist atrocity in Europe since the 2004 Madrid train bombings has left the country reeling. An enormous bomb exploded somewhere within a complex of government buildings at 3.30 in the afternoon. The offices of prime minister Jens Stoltenberg appear to have been the main target, although the Oil Ministry’s building across the road was also destroyed. The blast was so powerful that windows were blown out along several blocks. Seven people were killed and many more injured by flying glass and debris. The perpetrator(s) chose a public holiday to carry out the deed, so most government employees were not working that day. But the open layout of government buildings in Norway, reflecting of the relatively open nature of Norwegian society, meant that security is very low compared to anything most countries’ citizens are used to in this totalitarian age.

In response to the media’s leading questions about this being ‘Norway’s 9/11’, the Associated Press quoted a Norwegian police official as saying that the terror attack was more like the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing than the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center. It’s a curious comparison to make because, as Stephen Lendman explained in an interview he gave to Press TV, the Oklahoma bombing was blamed on a right-wing extremist and his huge car bomb, but the explosives evidence later pointed to something else entirely:
There have been numerous mass shootings in recent years, but the massacre on Utoya island is the worst yet. The camp on this tiny island, which lies just 700 meters from the shore, was organised by the AUF, the youth wing of the ruling Labour Party. In fact, the island was owned by this organisation; it has held regular summer camps there for decades and is well known to Norwegians. Most of the attendees were 14 to 19 year olds with an interest in politics attending seminars, partying, taking part in debates, playing music and listening to speeches on everything from local issues to international politics. In attacking the government’s headquarters in downtown Oslo and then the gathering place of the country’s political future, those responsible have managed to pierce the beating heart of Norwegian society.

The chief suspect, Anders Behring Breivik, may have been aware that former Norwegian prime minister Gro Harlem Bruntland was hosting a seminar at the camp that very day. He supposedly missed her by half an hour because he was held up in the heavy traffic trying to leave Oslo. Current prime minister Jens Stoltenberg personally knew many of the victims, but then, as Norway has a small population, most Norwegians probably knew someone who had been directly affected.

© Allover Norway/Rex Features
Time to reflect. A girl stands among floral tributes placed in the fjord near the scene of last Friday’s shooting spree on Utøya island.

At this stage, it seems pretty outlandish to me that just one person could be responsible for so much carnage. Breivik is supposed to have left downtown Oslo following the explosion and travelled 38 kms to an island in a fjord that is only accessible by boat. He arrived armed to the teeth and dressed as a police officer and began shooting people with an automatic rifle and a shotgun. Doctors have said that he was using dumdum bullets, expanding rounds designed to inflict the deadliest wounds possible on victims. Most of the bodies were horrifically mutilated in this manner. I’ve read one reportthat he actually removed the tip of every bullet he took with him and injected each with pure liquid nicotine in order to cause his victims as much pain as possible:

Dr Colin Poole, from Ringriket Hospital in Honefoss, north-west of Oslo, said: “Those on the dead brought in from the island are the worst I’ve ever seen. “They are very difficult to x-ray because the bullets just shatter everything into tiny pieces.”

Survivors’ accounts about how the shooting began conflict. On the one hand surviving teenagers have reported how he gathered people around him by saying that he wanted to question them in relation to the earlier bombing in the city. But then there is the testimony of 45 year old Monica Bosei, who was known as the “mother of Utoya” and had worked at the camp for more than 20 years. She took the same boat to the island as Breivik. The UK’s Telegraph reports,

Because he was wearing a police uniform she approached him to talk about the bomb blast in Oslo but became suspicious by his evasive answers.

As soon as the boat docked she ran over to Mr Berntsen to alert him but Breivik realised that they had clocked him and shot them both immediately, Mrs Bosei, an accountant whose two daughters were also at the camp but survived, was his first victim.

Breivik’s second victim, Trond Berntsen, was an off-duty police officer assigned to security duty on the island. Brentsen was also a step-brother of Norway’s Crown Princess Mette-Marit. Here is 15-year-old Jo Granli Kallset’s account of the opening horror:

He said ‘I am the police, there is a boat at the corner of the island’. I replied ‘Hi, we’re here,’ and two seconds later he fired on a rock in front of me. I jumped into the water. It was horrible – we were hunted down. It was a massacre, everyone was dying around me. He came up to us, he was dressed like a policeman. He had all the equipment – the walkie-talkie, the arms, everything. I swam for about an hour, and when it was nearly over, I swam towards other people who had assembled as a group and we were helped by a boat. My girlfriend, myself and two others survived.

The earlier reports about a second shooter have disappeared. So have the earlier reports about there being at least two explosions in downtown Oslo that day. The enormous damage done to Oslo’s government buildings is neatly explained by Breivik’s farming enterprises, through which he supposedly acquired copious quantities of fertiliser – 6 tonnes, in fact. Bob Ayers, former US intelligence official, points out that this quantity of fertiliser “wouldn’t have fit in one car”. Maybe there were two cars? But that might require an accomplice, something the official narrative doesn’t seem prepared to countenance. Now it’s emerged that at least two other buildings were targets, but Breivik’s lawyer won’t saywhat “things happened that day to make things turn out differently.”

VG [Norwegian newspaper] has spoken to witnesses describing another culprit who was not wearing a police uniform.

This second person who was pursuing them was around 180 centimeters tall, had thick dark hair and looked Nordic. He had a pistol in his right hand and a rifle on his back.

“I believe that there were two people who shot at us,” says Alexander Stavdal, aged 23.

The sophisticated planning that went into this took into account that only one police helicopter – covering the whole length of the country apparently – would be available to respond. Explaining why the response was so slow, Oslo Chief of Police Johan Fredriksen told reporters that they were down to just one helicopter crew because everyone else was on holiday. In fact, the helicopter circling overhead while the shooting continued was a media helicopter, which had reached the island first and captured these gruesome images of Brevik surrounded by dead bodies floating in the lake and what looks like a teenaged boy pleading for mercy:

© The Sun
A still from a helicopter camera supposedly shows the gunman surrounded by dead bodies

Breivik refused to plead guilty in court, instead laying the blame for the killings on the “treason” of Norway’s ruling Labour Party in sanctioning ‘Muslim immigration’. He further described the murder of 76 people as “an act of conscience”. No wonder the lawyer assigned to represent Breivik thinks that he’s completely insane. Geir Lippestad said he was “very cold, distanced from the real world and believing that he was a warrior destined to die for the eventual salvation of European Christian values. […] I can’t describe him because he’s not like anyone […] this whole case has indicated that he is insane.”

With three mass shootings leaving 29 dead in the US late last week also, was there something in the air at the time? Did Breivik act alone or did he have accomplices? Could he have actually carried this out alone? Could this guy have also been involved? He is an AUF member who was also on the island that day but his suspicious behaviour and possession of a knife led to his arrest back on the mainland.

On 24 July, two masked men in military uniform shot dead a 27 year old man in his home in Sandnes, Norway. As Craig Murray points out, killings with firearms are rare in Norway, so what are the odds that this is not related to the events on 22 July?

What about the Polish man arrested in connection with the attacks? He’s supposed to have sold Breivik chemicals used to make his ‘homemade bomb’ and has since been charged with “crimes against public safety”. Once the Norwegian authorities have picked apart Breivik’s 1,500 page manifesto, they should have all the leads they need to track down who and how Breivik connected with in his dedicated planning for this attack. More on that later.

The initial claim of responsibility for the bombing(s) by yet another ‘previously unknown Islamic terror group’ – “Helpers of Global Jihad” – was followed up by headlines such as this from Rupert Murdoch’s The Sun:

© The Sun

They couldn’t have been any more wrong. The ‘Islamic terrorist attack’ reverted to being the work of a lone gunman, as these events often do, when it emerged that the perpetrator was a 32 year old white middle class Norwegian with extremely Islamophobic views. I mean, this guy is so right-wing that he was booted off Stormfront’s website. We’re being asked to believe that he spent a total of nine years preparing for these attacks and raised adequate funds all on his lonesome to fund his war plans. His deadly accurate sharp-shooter training is supposed to have come from playing World of Warcraft and other computer games, in between impressing fellow right-wingers with his lofty rhetoric about the pure morality of white Christian European values, defending Israel’s ‘right to exist’, and attending far-right rallies.

Breivik claims to have spent three years researching and writing a 1,500 page document titled “2083: A European Declaration of Independence”. Assuming for now that it is Breivik’s work, this book is a meticulously detailed, blow-by-blow account of precisely how he went about it and reveals as psychopathic an inner landscape as you’re ever likely to read by first hand account. Based on a distinctly Israelite philosophy of ‘Hate Islam, Must Kill Muslims’, Breivik catalogues ‘Muslim crimes’, itemises every expense he had in the run-up to his ‘mission’, provides in-depth agricultural advice for growing produce, instructions on to procure weapons, uniforms and so on. Of course, nowhere does it explain why hating Islam entails killing left-leaning Norwegian teenagers, but I’ll get to that later.

In a section headed ‘Controversial principles’, Breivik writes,”Let us fight together with Israel, with our Zionist brothers against all anti-Zionists, against all cultural Marxists/multiculturalists.” Nevermind that the ‘multiculturalism’ they so deride, as extensively documented by Kevin MacDonald, is a product of Jewish intervention in Western society! Hmmm, maybe that is an important clue here…

Breivik wants hundreds of thousands of ‘traitors’ and ‘enablers’ (pretty much the whole intelligentsia of Europe in fact) to be executed for allowing Muslims to enter Europe, wants South Africa to be partitioned to make way for a new Boer/Afrikaner statelet, wants all Muslims deported from the West Bank and Gaza Strip, wants all Muslims deported from Europe… in fact, he wants Muslims everywhere to be deported back ‘whence they came’.

Breivik describes how he started a business, played the markets and used nine credit cards to fund the massacre. He didn’t just explain how he went about it; he recorded in excruciating detail how he procured the materials, built his bombs and staved off suspicions from neighbours, friends and local authorities. He closely studied all modern era revolutionary and militant movements, analysing what he saw as their flaws and successes. The book reads like a blueprint for engaging in terrorism and I’ve no doubt that Breivik, and whoever his handlers are, intend for others to pick up where he left off and run with it.

The book also served as Breivik’s journal in which he accounted for everything he did to prepare for the attack, from acquiring arms and fertiliser to machine parts and tailor-made badges he had embroidered on his uniforms. For such a puritan die-hard revolutionary in the name of a ‘Christian’ cause, his journal entries describing drink and drug-fuelled benders and sex with prostitutes. Harvey Cleckley’s account of the psychopath’s need to take ‘vacations into filth’ come to mind here. He apparently had plastic surgerydone to his face in the US because he felt that he looked “too feminine” (which he blamed on being raised without a father.)

These Muslims must be considered as wild animals. Do not blame the wild animals but rather the multiculturalist category A and B traitors who allowed these animals to enter our lands.

He goes on to define category A, B and C ‘traitors’, and says that they would be executed under the future regime of him and his Christian soldiers. Breivik was methodical and devout in his belief that killing people is the right thing to do. He laid out a suggested study course for his imaginary army, complete with recommended reading and links to articles and speeches. There are eerie parallels with the Joel’s Army faction of the fascist Christian Dominionism movement in the US, with which Sarah Palin is closely affiliated.

At first glance it seems bizarre that today’s most extreme right-wing authoritarians (RWAs) are vociferously supportive of Israel. Historically, contempt of Jews, actual anti-Semitism, has been central to all brands of white racist ideology. RWAs seem to have been reprogrammed since (or by?) 9/11, when hatred of Muslims was sanctioned by the authorities and proactively disseminated through all available channels. All things Zionist have become ideals and role models for the far-right. I guess that like water finding its own level, those people whose underlying tendencies are oriented towards violence, ‘creative destruction’ and domination over others, will naturally wind up supporting and reinforcing each other.

This still from a BBC report on an EDL meeting in Amsterdam clearly shows the far-right’s identification with Zionism.

Those on the pathological spectrum, psychopaths in particular, but also RWAs in general, ‘recognise their own’. On a visit to Northern Ireland a few years ago, I saw Israeli and old Apartheid South African flags adorning the streets of British loyalist cantons. This is also why English Defence League members and Glasgow Rangers football club supporters wave Israeli flags at their gatherings. They identify with psychopathology in its most extreme manifestation. Their ideologies, supported by suitably revised propaganda material, allow them to project their woes and all the societal problems they see around them onto ‘the other’. Like Israelis, they believe they are the last line of defence of a racially and morally pure world, where the ‘old, true values’ retain their worth, surrounded by a sea of immorality – Muslims, Catholics, ‘Multiculturalists’ and so on.

I’d like to say that I can understand what motivates a psychopath like Breivik, but I really can’t. In preparing this article I found myself being drawn into this document he spent so long preparing. EDL members who have met Breivik or interacted with him online recall a ‘hypnotic‘ personality. It’s a nauseating read, so dark and unhinged from reality. Polish psychologist Andrej Lobaczewski wrote of schizoidal psychopathy in Political Ponerology:

During stable times which are ostensibly happy, albeit marked by injury to individuals and nations, doctrinaire people believe they have found a simple solution to fix such a world. Such a historical period is always characterized by an impoverished psychological world-view, a schizoidally impoverished psychological world-view thus does not stand out during such times and is accepted as legal tender. These doctrinaire individuals characteristically manifest a certain contempt with regard to moralists then preaching the need to rediscover lost human values and to develop a richer, more appropriate psychological world-view.

Schizoid characters aim to impose their own conceptual world upon other people or social groups, using relatively controlled pathological egotism and the exceptional tenacity derived from their persistent nature. They are thus eventually able to overpower another individual’s personality, which causes the latter’s behavior to turn desperately illogical. They may also exert a similar influence upon the group of people they have joined. They are psychological loners who feel better in some human organization, wherein they become zealots for some ideology, religious bigots, materialists, or adherents of an ideology with satanic features. If their activities consist of direct contact on a small social scale, their acquaintances easily perceive them to be eccentric, which limits their ponerogenic [evil-doing] role. However, if they manage to hide their own personality behind the written word, their influence may poison the minds of society in a wide scale and for a long time. […]

Character anomalies developing as a result of brain-tissue damage behave like insidious ponerogenetic factors. As a result of the above-described features, especially the above-mentioned naivete and an inability to comprehend the crux of a matter, their influence easily anchors in human minds, traumatizing our psyches, impoverishing and deforming our thoughts and feelings, and limiting individuals and societies’ ability to use common sense and to read a psychological or moral situation accurately. This opens the door to the influence of other pathological characters who most frequently carry some inherited psychological deviations [the big kahuna psychopaths in power]; they then push the characteropathic individuals [permanently damaged humans] into the shadows and proceed with their ponerogenetic work. […] An improved social system of the future should thus protect individuals and societies by preventing persons with the above deviations, or certain characteristics to be discussed below [inherited deviations], from any societal functions wherein the fate of other people would depend upon their behavior.

Revulsion is the normal, healthy response. But Breivik knows from his experiences with similarly oriented people that his material will ‘anchor’ in their minds. In fact, RWAs across Europe have already spoken out in support of his rabid Islamophobia, most notablya member of Berlusconi’s government in Italy:

Francesco Speroni, a leading member of the Northern League, the junior partner in Berlusconi’s conservative coalition, said: “Breivik’s ideas are in defence of western civilisation.”

Yesterday we reported that Mario Borghezi, another Northern League member and an Italian MEP, whose Freedom and Democracy group includes Ukip, had said, “One hundred per cent of Breivik’s ideas are good, in some cases extremely good. The positions of Breivik reflect the views of those movements across Europe which are winning elections.”

Breivik cited numerous well-known right-wing ‘conservative’ and pro-Zionist commentators, authors and bloggers in his screed. I’d like to think that at least some of them have done some soul-searching this past week, but then I remember that scores for introspection don’t rate too highly with RWAs. The horror of Breivik’s deeds certainly don’t seem to have affected him in any serious way, if this photo of him smirking as he left the courthouse in Oslo following his initial hearing is anything to go by:

There is little material evidence at this stage to suggest that this was anything more than the work of the deranged mind of one man. But the story doesn’t end there. Far-right extremists exist in every country and Breivik claims to have interacted with them. It doesn’t take long before you stumble across the involvement of intelligence agencies within these networks. Their role is ostensibly to monitor and infiltrate all extremist groups, from Breivik’s ‘Knights Templar’ and the EDL to al-Qaeda, but in reality, they co-opt and direct these groups towards the overarching agenda of the real instigators of revolution. These actors work by way of deception and so it’s only natural that we will not see their involvement at first glance. They remain in the shadows but if you pay attention a pattern emerges and their unmistakable thumbprints can be found wherever mayhem breaks out.

The last entry in the journal part of Breivik’s compendium is dated July 22 at 12.51. The document was sent to hundreds of far-right contactsand “7000 patriotic Facebook friends’, based mainly in England, at 14.08, less than an hour and a half before the bomb(s) went off in downtown Oslo, and from there was uploaded to file-sharing sites. This revived ‘Knights Templar organisation he claims to have been a founding member of, the PCCTS (Pauperes commilitones Christi Templique Solomonici – Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon), met in London in 2002. He doesn’t reveal who exactly he met except to say that his mentor’s name was ‘Richard’:

Around year 2000 I realised that the democratic struggle against the Islamisation of Europe, European multiculturalism was lost. It had gone too far. It is simply not possible to compete democratically with regimes who import millions of voters. 40 years of dialogue with the cultural Marxists/multiculturalists had ended up as a disaster. It would now only take 50-70 years before we, the Europeans are in a minority. As soon as I realised this I decided to explore alternative forms of opposition. Protesting is saying that you disagree. Resistance is saying you will put a stop to this. I decided I wanted to join the resistance movement.

However, the main problem then was that there weren’t any alternatives for me at all. There weren’t any known armed cultural conservative, or Christian, anti-Jihad movements.

An NS or racist/anti Jewish movement was completely out of the question, as they represented much of what I oppose. I came in contact with Serbian cultural conservatives through the internet. This initial contact would eventually result in my contact with several key individuals all over Europe and the forming of the group who would later establish the military order and tribunal, PCCTS, Knights Templar. I remember they did a complete screening and background check to ensure I was of the desired calibre. Two of them had reservations against inviting me due to my young age but the leader of the group insisted on my candidature. According to one of them, they were considering several hundred individuals throughout Europe for a training course. I met with them for the first time in London and later on two occasions in Balticum. I had the privilege of meeting one of the greatest living war heroes of Europe at the time, a Serbian crusader and war hero who had killed many Muslims in battle. Due to EU persecution for alleged crimes against Muslims he was living at one point in Liberia. I visited him in Monrovia once, just before the founding session in London, 2002.

I was the youngest one there, 23 years old at the time. One of the key founders instructed the rest of the group about several topics related to the goal of the organisation. I believe I scribbled down more than 50 full pages of notes regarding all possible related topics. Much of these notes are forwarded in the book 2083. It was basically a detailed long term plan on how to seize power in Western Europe. I did not fully comprehend at the time how privileged I was to be in the company of some of the most brilliant political and military tacticians of Europe. Some of us were unfamiliar with each other beforehand so I guess we all took a high risk meeting face to face. There were only 5 people in London re-founding the order and tribunal (1 by proxy) but there were around 25-30 attending in Balticum during the two sessions, individuals from all over Europe; Germany, France, Sweden, the UK, Denmark, Balticum, Benelux, Spain, Italy, Greece, Hungary, Austria, Armenia, Lebanon and Russia. Electronic or telephonic communication was completely prohibited, before, during and after the meetings. On our last meeting it was emphasised clearly that we cut off contact indefinitely. Any type of contact with other cells was strictly prohibited.

This was not sessions were regular combat cells were created. It was more like a training course for pioneer cell commanders. We were not instructed to attack specific targets, quite the opposite. We were encouraged to rather use the information distributed to contribute to build and expand the so called “cultural conservative anti-Jihad movement, either through spreading propaganda, provide funding for the creation of new groups through various forums or by recruiting other people directly. All individuals attending the sessions learned about PCCTS, the Knights Templar but they were not specifically instructed to represent that particular order and tribunal. Everyone was encouraged but at the end, it was their own decision how they decided to manifest their resistance. A special emphasis was put on the long term nature of the struggle (50-100 years). Our task was to contribute to a long term approach and not to act prematurely. If there was a large scale attack the next 10 years it was said, we should avoid any immediate follow up attacks as it would negate the shock effect of the subsequent attacks. A large successful attack every 5-12 years was optimal depending on available forces.

This was not a stereotypical “right wing” meeting full of underprivileged racist skinheads with a short temper, but quite the opposite. Most of them were successful entrepreneurs, business or political leaders, some with families, most of them Christian conservatives but also some agnostics and even atheists. I remember it struck me how impressed I was regarding how they had set up the screening parameters (for accepting new candidates). They obviously wanted resourceful pragmatical individuals who were able to keep information away from their loved ones and who were not in any way flagged by their governments. Every one of them was supportive of a Judeo Christian Europe and did not have any reservations against cooperating with non-European Christians Hindu or Buddhist nationalists. I had or have a relatively close relationship with at least one of them, an Englishman, who became my mentor. He was the one who first described the “perfect knight” and had written the initial fundament for this compendium. I was asked, not only once but twice, by my mentor; let’s call him Richard, to write a second edition of his compendium about the new European Knighthood. As such, I spent several years to create an economic platform which would allow me to study and write a second edition. And as of now, I have spent more than three years completing this second edition. Perhaps, someone out there will be able to contribute by creating a third edition one day.

Later on in this ‘compendium’, Breivik returns to the origins of this primary ponerogenic associationand strongly hints that one of the most racist bands of brownshirts operating freely in the EU today, the English Defence League (EDL), shares foundations with his masonic sect:

I wonder sometimes if one of the EDL founders was one of the co-founders of PCCTS, I guess I’ll never know for sure. EDL is a non-violent protest organisation though but I noticed they have copied a lot from the PCCTS. Then again, it is most likely just a coincidence. I do think a lot about what happened to some of the co-founders. It’s pointless to speculate I guess but I check the news regularly to see if anything has slipped through the media blackout relating to actions launched by individual resistance fighters or the European Resistance Organisations. I may or may not have had contact with at least 2 of these co-founders since the founding. Obviously, I can’t reveal any sensitive information so the above characteristic might be what I want you to believe and not the actual truth:-).

The EDL have naturally distanced themselves from Breivik’s actions, but Breivik’s hints that the meteoric rise of this fascist Islamophobic organisation may have grown out of the same deeper network as his crusader brigade are revealing in light of what we know about the involvement of British agents co-opting and directing other protest movements in the UK. I rather suspect that in this case we’re looking at something that was created as a front to serve both British, American and Israeli intelligence to begin with:

Breivik continues:

I used to have more than 600 EDL members as Facebook friends and have spoken with tens of EDL members and leaders. In fact; I was one of the individuals who supplied them with processed ideological material (including rhetorical strategies) in the very beginning. The EDL are in fact anti-racist, anti-fascist and anti-Nazi. They even have many members and leaders with non-European background (African and Asian). They have worked so hard, and continue to work hard, to keep National Socialists out of the organization, but yet they are strategically labeled as racist-fascist-Nazi-monsters by the multiculturalist authorities. The EDL, although having noble intentions are in fact dangerously naïve. EDL and KT [‘PCCTS/Knights Templar’] principles can never be reconciled as we are miles apart ideologically AND organizationally. The EDL even rejects taking a stand against multiculturalism which proves that they are even more naïve than Sarkozy, Merkel and Cameron who have all admitted that multiculturalism has been a failure and a disaster for Europe.

This ‘Declaration of Independence’ goes on and on like this for hundreds of pages. Such fine distinctions pointing out ideological differences between his own views, the EDL’s views and mainstream fascists’ views can’t blur the fact that they all draw their ‘anti-multiculturalist’ and Islamophobic stances from the anti-Muslim climate of fear and hysteria that has gripped the Western world since 9/11. It’s founded on the ludicrous fantasy that Muslims are taking over Europe and the US, raping and pillaging their way towards colonising the ‘free world’, all the while the US and EU governments bomb and invade more and more Muslim countries, steal their resources and institute draconian legislation which curtails civil liberties back home. Just as the Powers That Be at the time of Weimar Germany sought to convince Germans that the root of all evil lay in Jews, today we have the Powers That Be trying to convince the entire Western world that the root of all evil lies in Muslims.

KT was formed back in 2002 as a revolutionary conservative movement because we had lost hope that the democratic framework can solve Europe’s current problems. The EDL, on the other hand, IS a democratic movement. They STILL believe that the democratic system can solve Britain’s problems… This is why the EDL harshly condemns any and all revolutionary conservative movements that employ terror as a tool, such as the KT. And this is why, we, the KT view the EDL as naïve fools, wasting all their energy monkey-screaming to deaf ears while they should instead have focused on means and methods that are meaningful in regards to achieving true political change, in regards to tearing down the multiculturalist regime known as Britain. Unfortunately, the only meaningful resistance at this point in time is to use military force. So instead of monkey-screaming, they should instead focus on strategically demolishing one of the many British nuclear power plants, which effectively would completely cripple the British economy, contributing to creating an optimal climate for significant political change.

Once again, we see that Breivik’s thoughts display uncanny resemblance to the strategic thinking of Western intelligence agencies, who do precisely this: engineer terror attacks to “create an optimal climate for significant change.” Another reason for suspecting that Breivik probably did not act alone, or at the very least was being handled by his “mentor(s)”, is his constant references to other operational ‘cells’ in his organisation. Check out this entry for March 1st 2011:

Economic status (as of March 1st)

I decided to sell my dear Breitling Crosswind and my Montblanc Meisterstück pen in January in order to strengthen my operational budget. I was able to sell my Crosswind for 1800 Euro and my pen for 200 Euro.

My remaining budget is now:

In bank: 3750 Euro
In cash: 3750 Euro
Value of car: 4500 Euro
Credit (9 credit cards): 28 750 Euro

Logistical plans ahead (as of March 1st)

I will shortly convert the public listing/definition of my company from regular to agricultural. This will allow me to acquire (rent) and register a farm with accompanying fields. The fields, registered through my company, will give me a specific “farming ID number” which is a requirement for ordering large amounts of fertilizer from the national supplier.

The cover I am using is; test production of sugar beet. I have created a 10 page “business plan” for this purpose, and have familiarized myself with the related terminology. As such, I am soon ready to place “rent adds” in agricultural newspapers, with intent to rent the farm/fields.

As soon as I rent the farm; I plan to move all my equipment to the farm house and initiate the “explosive manufacturing phase”. The operation will be executed shortly after the manufacturing phase is completed. Will attempt to initiate contact with cell 8b and 8c in late March.

Remaining items/components to buy;

– Plastic sheeting: 30 Euro
– Alu/wood ramp for loading/unloading truck: 30 Euro
– Fertilizer – large 500 kg bag: 1 x CAN, 1 x N34, 1 x 0-5-17 (for show), repeat after a couple of weeks: 2000 Euro
– Sementmixer – rent or buy: 100 Euro
– Ethanol 96%, x 6L: 30 Euro
– Blue Police – flashing LED light – for one of the trucks: 150 Euro
– Face – splash proof face mask: 30 Euro
– Fork jack – for 600 kg sacks: 200 Euro
– Plastic base for 600 kg sacks (used with above): 200 Euro
– Refrigerator: 100 Euro)
– Freezer: 100 Euro)
– Fume hood: 1000 Euro, not yet decided
– Microballoons, 20 kg
– Glock 17: 700 Euro
– More ammo: 1000 Euro
– Dunnage air-bag for transport load securing (, bought from Ebay: 100 Euro
– Straps/net for securing large load in truck, may use alu/metal profiles with screws to support

Breivik really believes that an army will rise up to replace him, so his document lays out exactly which types of uniforms future members of his PCCTS organisation should buy for which occasion, which badges to wear and which materials they should be made from. He includes mock speeches his followers should give in court when caught. He explains exactly how he developed two key chemicals used in his explosives – picric acid and DDNP – before concluding that,

there is absolutely NO GOOD REASON why anyone (unless flagged by the intelligence agency) shouldn’t be able to acquire the above materials and gear WITHOUT detection. The only thing that is holding you back is unfounded fear or laziness! Your fear for detection cannot be justified, unless you have an Islamic name<3

He signed the document as follows:

Andrew Berwick, code name “Sigurd (the Crusader)” [after Sigurd Jorsalfare, the 12th century Norwegian king] – Justiciar Knight Commander for Knights Templar Europe and one of several leaders of the National and pan-European Patriotic Resistance Movement

With the assistance from brothers and sisters in England, France, Germany, Sweden, Austria, Italy, Spain, Finland, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, the US etc.

© Agence France-Presse
Crowds gather in Oslo around a flower tribute to the victims

On several occasions, according to his journal, he suspected that authorities unknown were on to him because he was being tailed and watched. Despite this, he manages to succeed with his mission. Since the attacks, the Norwegian police have said that they were taken completely by surprise; they had no idea who he was and he was on no watch-list. Yet the police anti-terrorist unit apparently called out his name when they landed on the island. On pointing out this contradiction, journalists were told that police had managed to identify Breivik from CCTV footage of him at the scene of the ‘car bomb’. But the main point to be made here is that he absolutely was well-known to somebody high up the chain of command. British intelligence is known to have tracked the deadly car bomb into position during the worst terrorist atrocity in Omagh, Northern Ireland. The blast was blamed on the ‘Real IRA’, but it has since emerged that MI5 knew exactly what was in the car and did nothing to intervene.

All around, Breivik seemed to know an awful lot about how the system works, both within Norway and in general. He had particular expertise in military strategy, specialised military training, military intelligence, how to conduct special operations, and so on. He did not pick this up from playing World of Warcraft alone in his bedroom. I’m leaning towards the idea that this secret society he imagines himself to be a part of is largely a figment of his imagination, carefully fed to him by a combination of handlers, mind control techniques and the psychopath’s extreme tendency towards wishful thinking. That’s not to say that there are no other ‘cells’ across Europe and the US in the way Breivik describes. But rather than being networked together through some grand lodge of holy jesus crusaders, they’re basically just names on a database which the Powers That be can draw on, manipulate into position, then ‘turn on’. Just as ‘al Qaeda’ is.

Whether or not we find explicit state-sponsorship behind these horrific terror attacks remains to be seen. In the meantime, we can say with some certainty that both ideologically and energetically, Breivik and others behind this are joined on the spiritual front by a whole host of evil. I reckon those initial media reports saying that this was the work of ‘Islamic terrorists’ revealed the first signature of the true instigators. Joe Quinn highlightsanother ‘signature’:

The attacks in Oslo and Utoya island came 65 years, to the day, after the original Zionist terror group Irgun, bombed the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. While all the other details strongly suggest an Israeli hand behind this particular act of inhumanity, perhaps the timing is the real Israeli ‘signature’. The bombing of the Kind David hotel was an attempt by Zionist terrorists to prevent foreign intervention in their plans for covert global domination. The attacks in Oslo and Utoya island fit the same profile.

The timing of this terrorist attack is dead interesting in light of the Norwegian government’s ongoing meetings with Palestinian leaders and the anticipated Norwegian recognition of Palestinian statehood. Norway’s Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Store was to welcome Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on July 25 to show that Norway was ready to recognise a Palestinian state and to sign an agreement that would upgrade the Palestinians’ representative in Norway to ambassadorial status. Iceland’s intention to recognise a Palestinian state means it had better be on the lookout too. The day before the shootings, Store visited the Labour Youth Camp on Utoya island and was greeted by banners urging a boycott of Israel and the immediate recognition of a Palestinian state. Norwegian press reportthat he told the youngsters:

“The Palestinians must have their own state, the occupation must end, the wall must be demolished and it must happen now,” said the Foreign Minister to cheers from the audience.

“We are ready to recognize a Palestinian state. I await the actual resolution text Palestinians will promote the UN General Assembly in September.”

© Asociated Press
Engaged: Smiling youngsters listen to a speech during the Norwegian Labour Party youth camp on Utoya Island, just 24 hours before gunman Anders Breivik shot dead 68

Author and musician Gilad Atzmon found another‘signature’:

Just one day before last Friday’s massacre in Norway, US NeoConservative David Horowitz carried an article by Joseph Klein in his Front Page magazine, entitled “The Quislings of Norway,” which might as well have provided mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik with all the motivation he needed to commit his crime.

Klein wrote a scathing article about Norway’s support for Palestinian statehood and its unilateral moves towards complete divestment of Israeli companies. Wayne Madsen highlights otherclues:

In a move that complements American and Israeli propaganda that Norway has not stepped up to the surveillance state model imposed by other Western governments, the suspicious WikiLeaks decided to release U.S. State Department cables from the U.S. embassy in Oslo that criticized Norway for not recognizing the “Al Qaeda” threat and maintaining an insufficient security apparatus to combat Islamist terrorism and Pakistani immigrants. […]

Last November, the Norwegian government was shocked to learn that the U.S. embassy was operating a Surveillance Detection Unit in Oslo that was monitoring Norwegian citizens. […] Just 48 hours before the bombing in Oslo, police units were engaged in a terrorist bombing exercise at the Oslo Opera House, near what would later be “ground zero.” In addition, in the days before the terrorist bombing, there was suspicious sewer work being conducted in the area near the Prime Minister’s office.

On 28 July, the Norwegian government announced that it is dropping its investigation into the illegal surveillance of Norwegian citizens by the US embassy in Oslo. They’ve decided not to file charges against the US and its embassy personnel, claiming that “they lacked evidence that any laws had in fact been broken.” Yeah, right. This caused uproar in Norway when the scandal broke because it was so blatantly illegal. But it looks like the Stoltenberg government has got the message and will now look the other way while the CIA and friends get on with their thing.

© Associated Press
Mourning roses cast by sympathizers float in the lake near the island of Utoya, Norway, Sunday, July 24, 2011.

Another Oslo embassy cable highlighted US displeasure at Norway’s reluctance to play ball in their War of Terror™: US ambassador to Norway Barry White, who is Jewish and received a 2005 award from the pro-Israel American Jewish Committee, complained that the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) rejected two twelve-person British MI6 intelligence surveillance teams to monitor an ‘al Qaeda cell’ in Norway. Given the British and American intelligence agencies’ endeavours to proactively set up ‘al Qaeda cells’ in their own countries and to ‘find’ al Qaeda cells in other countries (usually by torturing confessions out of them), I can’t help but wonder if the Norwegian government said “thanks, but no thanks”, thus sending the message that it knows too well that the ‘War on Terror’ is bogus. That will not do, of course. Remember what Dubya said? “You’re either with us or you’re against us.” Now consider Obama’s statementfollowing the attacks:

“It’s a reminder that the entire international community has a stake in preventing this kind of terror from occurring, and that we have to work co-operatively together both on intelligence and in terms of prevention of these kinds of horrible attacks.”

See Norway, you work with us, then this won’t happen again, ok? New Zealand’s Prime Minister John Key, who was on a state visit to Washington, DC, added:

“If it is an act of global terrorism I think it shows that no country, large or small, is immune from that risk, and that is why New Zealand plays its part in Afghanistan as we try and join others like the United States in making the world a safer place.”

Right. And what does this have to do with the fact that the killer was a lone nut Norwegian ‘Christian’? Nothing, according to the official narrative. But if we read between the lines here, it reads like a not-so-subtle hint to the Norwegian government that its plans to pull out of the slaughterfest in Libya is considered disobedient. Now John Key is a man who knows what side his bread is buttered on. He recently ensured the correct conclusions were reached in an investigation into the actions of suspected Mossad agents in Christchurch on the day of the devastating earthquake in February.
Norway is one of the few remaining socialist countries on the planet. I realise that this may be misunderstood by many, so let’s frame it in this way: by socialist, I mean that the Norwegian population’s self-organisation is largely governed by adherence to the humane principles of justice, equality and freedom – in the original meaning of those words, not the new meanings that have been inserted by the psychopaths which dominate international institutions and nearly all governments. The country has a very high standard of living compared with other European countries and a strongly integrated welfare system. It remains outside of EU control, is self-sufficient in terms of energy resources and most raw materials, and positions itself as a broker of peace in the international arena. Their security services are few in number and police the streets unarmed. Their central banker can wander to the store to pick up some groceries without having to watch his back because he placed ordinary Norwegians under the international banking cartel’s control of debt.This event has shown that Norway is susceptible to the ponerological influence of pathological factors like everywhere else, yet it seems to me that the rule of normal man still retains its power in Norway to a far greater extent than most countries, particularly those in the West which are beholden to the Zionist agenda for world revolution and global domination. I should also explain here what I understand by ‘Zionism’. I’m not just talking about the Israeli state’s regional imperialism in the Middle East. I’m thinking more along the lines of what Douglas Reed described in The Controversy of Zion. Not a world controlled by Jews – far from it. Rather, an ‘ideology’ that is so attractive to psychological deviants of every stripe in every country and culture because it thinly veils that which anchors in the minds of all the Breiviks out there, an insatiable thirst for power and domination over others, something that is so alien to humanity.Zionism is the ideology of psychopaths, their clarion call to fulfilling what they see as their rightful place as the Master Race. Participatory democracy, as Norwegians teach and live it, is humanitarian, inclusive and just. In this lies the true ‘clash of civilizations’. It is not about one race or one religion against another. It is a clash of ideologies which by and large orbit around two poles of existence. Zionism currently has the upper hand in this battle because it can draw on resources – knowledge in particular – which expand way above and beyond even the riches of Norway. There won’t be a level playing field upon which we can defend humanity from these attacks until we inoculate ourselves with the knowledge that will give us awareness of the true nature of the beast.

© Associated Press/Frank Augstein
a related post from Veteranstoday :

Organized Political Terrorism: The Norwegian Massacre, the State , the Media and Israel


They are coming for you ,everywhere ,worldwide …..


Only Fools and Zionist deal in absolutes !

Is Fukushima Act Of War Or Accident – Jim Stone Feet 2 Fire

i posted this a while ago …. lol .



French Fraud Behind Libya War Drive

Fake ‘intellectual’ with delusions of grandeur: Bernard Henri-Lévy

by Justin Raimondo, April 06, 2011

The Libyan war has the French, of all people, in the forefront, with President Nicolas Sarkozy’s smug, self-satisfied face mugging for the camera as French fighter jets scream in the skies over Tripoli. The French, who sat out the Iraq war with haughty disdain, are now even more eager than the Americans to get into the thick of it: Sarkozy, in trouble at home, is hoping to distract critics from France’s ever-worsening domestic economic woes and his own party’s diminishing electoral prospects, with a good old-fashioned dollop of Napoleonic tonic. France – once again thrusting into North Africa in search of its former imperial glory! It’s enough to make one nostalgic for the Ugly American.

If the insufferable Sarkozy isn’t enough to make you vow never to eat French fries again, then the man behind Sarkozy’s grandstanding, Bernard Henri-Lévy, the French “public intellectual” and renowned phony, will push you over the edge into outright Francophobia. As the New York Times reports:

“It was Mr. Lévy, by his own still undisputed account, who brought top members of the Libyan opposition — the Interim Transitional National Council — from Benghazi to Paris to meet President Nicolas Sarkozy on March 10, who suggested the unprecedented French recognition of the council as the legitimate government of Libya and who warned Mr. Sarkozy that unless he acted, ‘there will be a massacre in Benghazi, a bloodbath, and the blood of the people of Benghazi will stain the flag of France.’”

Henri-Lévy is famous for … well, it’s not exactly clear. During the 1980s, he and a few of his French commie-socialist comrades excitedly announced that Marxism – which they had previously upheld as a glorious human experiment in idealism – was a Bad Thing. What Stalin’s crimes, committed half a century earlier, hadn’t revealed, the dictates of intellectual fashion and economic opportunity readily unveiled.

Yes, the French have their neocons, too, with BHL—as he’s known – leading the pack. Like his American brethren, BHL combines political polemics with entrepreneurship and has wound up the world’s richest “philosopher,” with inherited assets of his own to which he greatly added to thanks to his political connections.

As questions are raised about the wisdom of Western intervention, the Pepe Le Pew of the War Party is perturbed, and he’s taken to the pages of the Huffington Post – home base for practically all the world’s phony “intellectuals” and empty-headed celebrities – to defend his baby:

“Ah yes. This war began less than a month ago, and already the Norpois, the leaden-footed proponents of salon diplomacy, well-versed in Munich-speak, have raised their heads again and, once over their initial astonishment, have taken up their favorite refrain: what are we doing, involved in this business?”

Leaving aside the pretentious allusion to Proust – the signature conceit of the “literary” French intellectual – notice how easily he reverts to the familiar lexicon of the neocons: “Munich-speak”? We’re not two weeks into this war, and already the War Party’s myrmidons are likening Gadhafi to Hitler! To the neocons, whatever their national origin, it’s always 1939: there’s always a Hitler somewhere in the world, and it’s our responsibility to stop him – which is why we need to spend more on the military than all other nations on earth combined. And if a target country just happens to be strategically located, or sits atop considerable oil reserves, well then who are we to look a gift horse in the mouth?

That’s a good point, however, about our “initial astonishment” at the Libyan intervention: I have to admit to being taken by surprise, because, as low as my opinion may be of President Obama, it was never that low. I never thought he would fall for Henri-Lévy’s line of guff, as regurgitated by the Three Harpies of the Libyan Apocalypse.

Well, then, what are we doing involved in this business?

“First of all, war aims. The ‘true’ aims of this war. And what if the allies had a ‘secret agenda’ and, in particular, “oil”. The imbeciles! The too-clever-for-their-own-good who, eternally seeking the hidden side of things, ultimately fail to see what is right there under their own eyes! Namely, that, oil for oil, there was one simple means to ensure control over Libyan oil, and that means was to touch nothing, to change nothing, and to go on dealing with Gadhafi, as they have for decades. Sarkozy, Cameron, Obama may be capable, like all politicians, of all the cynicism one likes. But concerning this affair, why not have the elementary honesty to recognize their share of sincerity?”

This is nonsensical. BHL may know his Proust, but he likely failed Economics 101. Go here and look at this map of foreign oil concessions in Libya, which are heavily concentrated in the rebellious eastern half of the country. Gadhafi made the British pay a huge price for their oil concessions: as British planes bomb Libyan air defenses – and a few civilians, too – does anyone think the rebels won’t give British Petroleum a better deal than Gadhafi ever would? And the French, who seem to have been largely left out of the Libyan oil rush, will certainly demand their share of the spoils.

Economics is not BHL’s strong point: you know how those French intellectuals are! Well, then, perhaps he’s better at military strategy, a favorite pastime of our neocon laptop bombardiers. On second thought, maybe not:

“Then, the length of this war. The way it has of ‘getting stuck’ in the sands of the Libyan desert, when we had hoped it would be short and sweet. Once again, grotesque. Unutterable bad faith. For–quite apart from the fact that four weeks is nothing compared to the decade of the Afghan war or the ten weeks of that of Kosovo–there is a reason, only one, that operations are lasting beyond the successful rescue of Benghazi. And this reason is the strategy of a Gadhafi who has hunkered down in the bunkers of his other cities, turning their inhabitants into human shields.”

A favorite neocon strategy: hyperbole. The opposition is not merely wrong, it is “grotesque.” These are not victims of error, but purveyors of “unutterable bad faith.” All for asking why it’s taking so long! BHL isn’t quite himself, it seems, unless he’s in a state of High Moral Dudgeon, but his passion let slip a telling detail. That he’s comparing an operation that was supposed to continue for “days, not weeks,” as the President put it, to the decade-long Afghan conflict merely confirms our worst fears about this latest adventure in world-saving: that an ambiguously defined mission, which is already expanding well beyond its original mandate, has every prospect of becoming a long term commitment.

“At that point, there are two strategies possible. Either blow up the crowd, in which case, yes, things will go swiftly (and it’s no surprise to see the butcher of Chechnya, Vladimir Putin, in the front ranks of those who think things are dragging on). Or else look out for the lives of civilians, not losing sight of the fact that the international community has provided a mandate to protect them, the civilians, and that it will take the time it will take. (To deny that, one must be drugged on quick solutions, drunk with the urge for immediacy, or, worse, irresponsible.)”

BHL never acknowledges what is apparent to even a casual observer of the Libyan events: that Gadhafi has real support in the country, especially in the area around Tripoli. After all, it isn’t just mercenaries fighting on his behalf: his fellow tribesmen and their allies, as well as Gadhafi’s personal followers and the beneficiaries of the regime, are apparently rallying to his cause. This is the reason why it hasn’t been a quick victory for the rebels. But to BHL, the “literary” intellectual, who references Proust instead of anything related to the reality of Libya, this is inadmissible because it ruins the narrative, the tall tale he’s telling himself and his audience about the demonic despot versus the virtuous rebels.

His third argument is just another neocon ploy: the old “straw man” strategem. BHL tells us that some people are criticizing the rebels for their “amateurism,” and then goes on for a good paragraph using this “criticism” to valorize them and make the case for arming and training them. “Indigent bastards!, they say. Good for nothings! Short hitters!” Who is the author of such slanderous epithets? Perhaps he means Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who, when asked, didn’t put very much store in the rebels’ military prowess – but so what?

“Fourth objection, the National Council of Transition. After all, what do we know of this Council of ‘nebulous’ outlines? And wasn’t France jumping the gun a bit in recognizing it? There again, it takes a lot of nerve to think so. And there’s something profoundly perverse in this way of depicting who knows what occult power–an Angkar as in Cambodia, the black box of a Libya not as free as it professes to be–and in this way of spreading doubt and insinuating, in reality, the worst. For the members of the Council are well known. Their biographies are transparent. They are either those who have earned a price on their heads in Tripoli for rallying to the cause, whose respective political itineraries are known to all, or men who are new but who speak to whomever openly. But it’s true that, to set this supposed mystery to rest, one must take the trouble to go to Benghazi….”

Emtting clouds of obfuscatory rhetoric like a squid under attack, BHL resorts to the familiar abuse of his opponents: they aren’t just “perverse,” they are “profoundly perverse.” Those ingrates “have a lot of nerve” to even ask questions about just who the UN and the NATO powers are throwing their weight behind. Because, after all, “the members of the Council are well-known.” To whom are they well-known, exactly? Well, it turns out, “to set this supposed mystery to rest one must take the trouble to go to Benghazi”!

Now that’s a dirty trick. He makes us read all the way to the end of that tortured paragraph before getting to the punchline – some “humanitarian”!

Reality, however, once again departs from BHL’s preferred narrative, because the biography of, say, Col. Khalifa Haftar, the US-supported self-proclaimed “commander” of the Libyan rebel forces, is far from “transparent” – especially regarding his capture during the war with Chad, an event which seems to have conicided with his remarkable political turnaround. The most well known rebel leaders are former officials of the Gadhafi regime, who supported him loyally for many years and only saw the light when it looked like the regime was finished – a record that may indeed be transparent, but is hardly admirable.

“And then, Al-Qaeda. Ah! Al-Qaeda. On the pretext that, among the foreign jihadis who once left to fight in Iraq were a small majority of Libyans, one concludes that there would be a majority of jihadis at the heart of today’s Free Libya. The sophism, in this case, is not only perverse, it is despicable. And it’s the same abjectness, by the way, that, fifteen years ago at Sarajevo, inferred the probable birth of a fundamentalist State in the heart of Europe–and therefore the necessity to let Bosnia in its entirety die–from the presence of a handful of Iranians in the 7th corps of the Bosnian army. In this case, the truth is simple. It is possible that a few jihadis have infiltrated Derna or Benghazi. It is probably a rule that such sleeper agents profit from the chaos of war to reinforce their position. But it is a lie, accredited for the time being only by hazy statements backed by a Gaddafism which is in dire straits and fresh out of arguments, that they have a significant role in the ranks of the insurgents.”

Getting past the name-calling – his opponents are, once again, “perverse,” and even “despicable” – the fact-free nature of BHL’s “argument” is readily apparent. To begin with, it wasn’t just the Iranians who were fighting on the side of the Bosnians and Kosovars during the Balkan wars: al-Qaeda sent a brigade to fight for the KLA during the Kosovo war, and continues to be a presence in the region. Furthermore, BHL doesn’t even mention the ample evidence that Al-Qaeda had its best recruiting success in Libya, although he does mention the town of Derna, where many fighters who fought US troops in Iraq hailed from.

Aside from this, however, to say that bin Laden’s boys do not now play a significant role in the Libyan insurgency is not to rule it out as a distinct possibility. As the only seasoned fighters, except for defecting Libyan soldiers, they are bound to acquire some renown and authority on account of their military experience. I am not one who believes, as some do, that the rebellion is the brainchild of Osama bin Laden. Yet, given the evidence, it is rational to raise the question of al-Qaeda’s influence – unless you’re a myth-maker, a spinner of ready-to-wear narratives, in which case it’s better not to ask too many questions.

“I would add,” says BHL, that

“The best way of delivering Libya into the hands of chaos would be to abandon in mid-river those we have encouraged to ford it, giving in, at the last minute, to the sirens who would convince us to save what can be saved of the Gadhafi regime. He, really, is not only a butcher of civilians, a patent hater of the West and of democratic values, the declared enemy of the Arab–and, tomorrow, the African–spring, but a world class champion, all categories included, of terrorism. More than ever, this man should beat it.”

“This man should beat it”?

Either the Huffington Post needs to get a new translator, or else BHL is going all “cool” and “trendy” on us by riffing on a Michael Jackson tune.

The author’s stylistic idiosyncrasies aside, however, his arguments are oddly familiar: now that we’ve already gotten involved, the West can’t just leave. The neocons made – and continue to make – the same argument when it comes to Iraq and Afghanistan. Heck, they sang the same song as the Vietnam war came to a bloody and chaotic close: we can’t leave our heroic allies in the lurch!

Ho Chi Minh was, no doubt, a butcher of civilians – although the US surpassed him in that regard – and also “a patent hater of the West and of democratic values,” but that war was a mistake from the beginning – just like this one. In that conflict, too, we helped one side in a civil war which had divided the country into two de facto independent states, one totalitarian and the other “free.” That war, too, started out small, with military aid and “advisers,” eventually expanding into a presence of hundreds of thousands of troops and a long drawn out conflict that ended in disaster – as this one will if we follow the course laid out by BHL and the War Party.

A word about BHL: this guy is supposed to be a “public intellectual,” but what kind of “intellectual” gets bamboozled by an obvious hoax such as this? Read and laugh at the pretensions of this champion phony.

Read more by Justin Raimondo

%d bloggers like this: